The People Don’t Live Here—Just Their Money
It’s 7 p.m. on a Tuesday in West Vancouver. The sun is setting. The streets are silent. There’s no traffic. No kids playing. No dog walkers. The lights in the homes lining the multimillion-dollar cul-de-sacs? Off. Every one of them.
Welcome to British Columbia’s ghost housing market—a surreal landscape of homes technically owned, legally occupied, but functionally empty. Entire neighborhoods that should hum with community are eerily still. And no, it’s not because of population decline or economic downturn.
It’s because of satellite families.
The term isn’t new. It refers to households where one family member—often the mother and children—reside in Canada (usually on a study or spousal visa), while the main income earner lives and works abroad. The family buys a home in Canada, usually in cash, and technically “lives” here. But in practice, the breadwinner never immigrates, rarely visits, and earns no Canadian income. The family becomes a satellite of another life—rooted elsewhere, parked in Canada.
It’s not just a personal choice. It’s a wealth strategy, and one that’s been deeply embedded in B.C.’s housing crisis for over two decades.
The Rise of Satellite Families in Metro Vancouver
Satellite families became a dominant force in Vancouver real estate beginning in the late 1990s and early 2000s, especially after Hong Kong’s 1997 handover, which triggered an exodus of wealthy families seeking overseas “backup plans.” This trend accelerated in the 2010s with waves of capital from Mainland China, Iran, and India, as political and economic instability pushed elites to move their families—and their assets—into safer jurisdictions.
And what’s safer than Canadian property? It’s not just stable—it’s tax-advantaged, lightly regulated, and socially prestigious.
The formula was simple:
Send the kids to school in B.C.—often in elite private institutions like Crofton House, York House, St. George’s, or Mulgrave.
Buy a detached home in a wealthy suburb like West Vancouver, Richmond, or South Granville.
Register the property under the child’s name or a spouse with PR status.
Declare minimal Canadian income.
Live off foreign funds while qualifying for benefits and avoiding local taxation.
It’s legal. It’s discreet. And it’s incredibly hard to trace.
According to Statistics Canada, as early as 2018, non-resident ownership of condos and homes in Metro Vancouver exceeded 10% in some areas, with far higher rates in luxury neighborhoods. In West Vancouver, nearly 20% of properties valued over $3 million were owned by individuals reporting zero Canadian income. That’s not just absentee ownership. That’s a model.
The impact? A parallel housing economy, driven not by local wages or family needs, but by global capital and lifestyle arbitrage. One parent earns abroad. The other lives in Canada to secure immigration, access public schooling, and eventually establish permanent residency.
This model became so prevalent that by 2016, the term “astronaut family” was widely used in Chinese-language real estate forums and by local educators who noticed an explosion in absentee parents and high-net-worth students showing up to class with luxury cars and no parental supervision.
How Satellite Families Skirt Canadian Tax Law—and Why It’s a Policy Blind Spot
At the center of the satellite family phenomenon is a question no one in government seems eager to answer:
How can someone live in a $4 million home, send their kids to elite schools, own luxury cars, and still report no Canadian income?
Simple. They don’t earn it here.
This is the heart of the tax arbitrage that makes the satellite family model so appealing—and dangerous. It allows wealthy foreign nationals to benefit from Canadian infrastructure, services, and protections while contributing little or nothing to the domestic tax base.
Here’s how the system works in practice:
The primary income earner resides abroad, often in countries with high levels of business opacity or capital flight, like China, Iran, or Russia.
They remit money to their spouse or children in Canada through legal wire transfers, foreign exchange services, or trust structures.
The resident family member declares minimal income or no income on Canadian tax returns—because technically, they’re not employed here.
The non-resident spouse is not required to file Canadian taxes, even if their entire family resides here full time.
The property, cars, and private school tuition are paid using “gifts” or foreign savings, which are not taxable under Canadian law unless the funds are demonstrably earned from Canadian sources.
Now scale this up.
In Metro Vancouver, thousands of households operate this way—many in high-value neighborhoods. According to BC Assessment, the number of luxury homes registered under individuals reporting less than $50,000 in income is disproportionately high. In some postal codes in Richmond and West Vancouver, that number exceeds 30%.
Let that sink in: nearly a third of owners of multimillion-dollar homes in some neighborhoods don’t appear to make enough to qualify for a mortgage, let alone afford property taxes, maintenance, and private schooling.
The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) is aware of this. In fact, it’s published multiple reports and launched high-net-worth audit programs targeting exactly this kind of behavior. But enforcement has been limited, slow, and inconsistent.
In 2021, a Globe and Mail investigation revealed that only a few dozen audits per year were actually conducted in B.C. against these families, despite thousands of high-risk profiles being flagged.
And even when the CRA investigates, its tools are limited. Canada has no wealth tax, no inheritance tax, and no comprehensive foreign asset reporting system. Most satellite families simply respond to audits by producing letters from their overseas employers, claiming the money was “gifted” or “loaned,” and move on.
Meanwhile, the family continues to enjoy:
Free public schooling
Subsidized healthcare
Eligibility for permanent residency
Access to clean, safe, stable Canadian communities
All without paying any federal or provincial income tax.
This isn’t tax evasion in the criminal sense. It’s legal avoidance—made possible by policy negligence and outdated enforcement tools. And the result is a two-tiered tax system: one for working Canadians, and another for global elites using satellite families to game residency without contributing.
We’re not the only ones dealing with this. Australia, New Zealand, and the UK have all grappled with similar issues. But they’ve responded more aggressively—with foreign buyer taxes, empty home penalties, and audits of student-funded luxury real estate purchases.
Canada? It keeps handing out PR cards and turning a blind eye.
The Social Cost: Hollow Communities, Disengagement, and the Collapse of Neighborhood Life
We often talk about housing in economic terms: prices, interest rates, taxes, supply, demand. But the satellite family phenomenon has created a less tangible, but equally devastating effect across Metro Vancouver: the erosion of community itself.
Because when neighborhoods become dominated by households that live here on paper but not in practice, the result is what locals call the "lights out syndrome"—rows of expensive homes with no people, no activity, no community heartbeat. It's the hollowing out of urban life, and it’s happening in real time.
Let’s take a walk down a few streets in Point Grey, South Cambie, or Ambleside. On paper, these are some of the wealthiest and most desirable neighborhoods in Canada. But visit them on a weeknight, and they feel more like suburban graveyards than thriving communities.
Lawns are immaculate, but no one is gardening.
Garages are filled with luxury cars, but there’s no driveway chatter.
The few children who do attend local schools often show up with drivers or nannies, not parents.
Trick-or-treating is sparse. Block parties are rare. Community leagues are underfunded.
Local businesses that once served full-time residents now cater to a transient, high-wealth demographic, or close down altogether.
The concept of a neighborhood—once rooted in mutual investment, shared space, and civic life—has been replaced by property portfolios. And the data confirms this.
According to Vancouver's Empty Homes Tax report, the majority of empty or underused homes are concentrated in neighborhoods with high satellite family presence. That includes Shaughnessy, West End, and Marpole, where vacancy rates are far above the city average.
In these areas, housing has been reduced to a commodity, not a place to live. And that change has profound knock-on effects:
Schools struggle to plan: When kids are enrolled but rarely attend, or show up for just part of the year, it’s difficult for school boards to allocate resources.
Volunteerism collapses: With absentee parents and disconnected residents, the social fabric thins. PTAs go empty. Community centers lose momentum.
Voting rates drop: Non-citizen residents—and those with only technical PR—rarely engage politically. Some neighborhoods report turnout below 30%.
Local businesses suffer: Grocers, coffee shops, dry cleaners, and dentists all rely on consistent foot traffic. Ghost neighborhoods mean ghost revenues.
Sociologists have even coined terms for this: “residential decoupling” (when ownership and occupancy are no longer linked), and “transnational gentrification” (when locals are displaced not by hipsters, but by global capital).
One Vancouver neighborhood organizer put it bluntly:
“We lost the soul of our block in 2015. We still live here—but we don’t belong here anymore.”
That’s the tragedy of the satellite family model. It doesn’t just change who owns homes—it changes what home means.
When real estate becomes a means to secure a passport, launder wealth, or establish a geopolitical backup plan, the social contract of homeownership dissolves. People stop investing in their neighbors. They stop caring about local issues. They live in silos, if they live here at all.
And that vacuum doesn’t stay isolated. It spreads.
Rental demand increases as ownership stock gets hoarded. Political alienation grows as locals feel unheard. Tensions rise between newcomers and longtime residents. And public services—funded by property taxes and shaped by civic engagement—start to fray.
This isn’t anti-immigrant rhetoric. It's about how we define participation in a city—and what we lose when people buy in, but never show up.
How Schools, Immigration Pathways, and Developers Enable the Satellite Family Strategy
The satellite family model didn’t evolve by accident. It was cultivated, facilitated, and encouraged by three powerful forces in British Columbia: private schools, immigration lawyers, and real estate developers.
Each of these industries saw opportunity—not in housing people, but in accommodating capital. And so, a quiet, profitable ecosystem emerged: one that turned international families into a revenue stream instead of community members.
Let’s start with education.
Private Schools: The Prestige Entry Point
For thousands of high-net-worth families in China, the Middle East, and South Asia, enrolling a child in a prestigious B.C. private school is the first step toward setting up a satellite presence.
Schools like St. George’s, York House, West Point Grey Academy, and Mulgrave are internationally renowned. Their graduates go to UBC, Stanford, LSE, and Tsinghua. And for international families, getting a child into one of these schools is not just about education—it’s about legitimacy, immigration access, and social capital.
Tuition? No problem. With annual fees of $25,000–$35,000, these schools aren’t deterred by affordability. Many offer admission pathways that don’t require permanent residency—just a valid student visa. In some cases, they’ll even help with visa referrals or offer support for homestay arrangements.
But many of these students don’t need homestays. Their parents buy them condos. Or they live in a mansion with a family friend or aunt. Often, their legal guardian is a Canadian relative or a paid representative.
By enrolling a child, the family establishes educational residency—an important factor when later applying for permanent residency or citizenship under family reunification programs. Meanwhile, the child’s time in school qualifies them for in-province tuition, healthcare, and residency claims.
And it’s not just private schools. Public school districts—desperate for funding—have also opened their doors to international students for profit. According to the B.C. Ministry of Education, more than 15,000 international K-12 students were enrolled in public schools across the province as of 2023, generating over $250 million in annual tuition revenue.
That’s right: your neighborhood school may be hosting international students whose parents bought real estate just to establish a local address.
Immigration Consultants: The Gatekeepers of Strategy
Once the child is here, it’s time to lock in the legal structure. Enter the immigration consultant.
These firms—some licensed, many not—offer full-service “relocation packages” for wealthy families. Services often include:
School admissions assistance
Study permit applications
Real estate agent referrals
Corporation setup
Nominee ownership services
Spousal visa applications
PR pathways through provincial programs
Strategic tax minimization advice
And yes, they openly market the satellite family model. Some even publish blog posts like “How to Move Your Family to Vancouver While Keeping Your Business in China.”
A 2021 Toronto Star investigation uncovered several agencies offering to help foreign families “park capital in Canadian homes through minor children.” The entire industry has become a middleman for global wealth transfer into local housing.
Developers: The Willing Enablers
Finally, let’s talk about the developers.
They know exactly who their buyers are. In fact, many developers target satellite families specifically. Why?
They buy early.
They pay cash.
They don’t haggle.
They buy in bulk.
They rarely complain about construction delays or defects.
They often don’t occupy the unit, so it stays showroom-perfect.
Pre-sale marketing materials are routinely translated into Mandarin, Farsi, and Korean. Sales events are held in Shanghai, Seoul, Dubai, and Tehran. Realtor commissions are padded to reward offshore referrals.
Some developers even advertise the “school district appeal” of certain projects, with messaging like:
“Minutes from top private schools—ideal for international families.”
And once the deal is signed, no one asks where the money comes from, whether the buyer actually lives in Canada, or whether the property will be used. Developers get their 20% deposit and move on.
This isn’t speculation. It’s a supply chain—designed for foreign capital and optimized for absentee ownership. Meanwhile, the local buyer is told to save harder, bid faster, and accept that Vancouver is “world-class,” so world-class prices come with it.
Why B.C.'s Policy Response Has Failed—and Who Keeps Blocking Reform
By now, the story is clear: satellite families are not the exception—they’re a well-oiled feature of B.C.’s real estate economy. And if that’s the case, why hasn’t the government done anything meaningful to stop it?
The short answer: they don’t want to.
The long answer? Political dependency on housing revenue, bureaucratic inertia, fear of alienating immigrant voters, and intense pressure from real estate lobbyists.
Let’s unpack that.
1. Governments Make Too Much Money from Housing—Even When It’s Hollow
For both the Province of British Columbia and its municipalities, real estate is a cash cow.
Property transfer taxes generated over $3.2 billion in 2022 alone, according to B.C.’s Public Accounts.
Municipalities collect billions in development charges, permit fees, and property taxes—regardless of whether the home is occupied or not.
School districts benefit from international student tuition.
Provinces quietly pocket income tax from construction workers and realtors working in high-volume development environments.
When foreign families buy homes, developers build more units, more taxes are collected, and GDP goes up. Politicians love that. It makes their spreadsheets look pretty.
The fact that those homes sit empty, drain civic life, or price out locals? That’s a footnote. This is why policies like the Speculation and Vacancy Tax, Empty Homes Tax, and foreign buyer tax were designed to look bold—but ultimately lack the teeth to tackle satellite families.
For example:
The 20% foreign buyer tax doesn’t apply if the home is purchased by a PR-holding spouse or child.
The Speculation and Vacancy Tax offers exemptions for family members using the home part-time—even if the main income earner doesn’t reside in Canada.
The Empty Homes Tax doesn’t apply to principal residences—even if no one actually lives there full-time.
The Land Owner Transparency Registry (LOTR) still allows nominee ownership, trust structures, and corporations to shield real beneficial ownership from public view.
Politicians get to say “We’re acting!” while preserving the flow of capital and developer influence.
2. Political Parties Rely on Developer Money and Realtor Influence
It’s no secret that B.C.’s political parties have deep ties to the real estate industry.
The BC Liberal Party (now BC United) received millions in donations from developers between 2005 and 2017—before corporate donations were banned.
Several mayors and councilors in Metro Vancouver, including former Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson, had cozy ties to major developers.
The Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver regularly lobbies against policies it deems "hostile" to property owners or investors—including aggressive vacancy penalties or stricter ownership transparency.
Even now, the developer ecosystem funds local campaigns, shapes public discourse through sponsored op-eds, and maintains close relationships with municipal staffers.
And immigration consultants? They’re quietly lobbying too. The international education and migration sector is worth billions annually, and they have no interest in reducing the appeal of Canada’s satellite family model.
That’s why every reform—no matter how obvious—gets watered down:
A foreign buyer registry that doesn’t verify source of funds.
A luxury tax that exempts nominee-bought homes.
A public land registry that redacts ownership details unless you pay a fee.
And when the media pushes back, politicians frame critics as xenophobic or anti-immigrant—shutting down debate instead of addressing structural problems.
3. The Federal Government Is Missing in Action
Housing is a shared jurisdiction in Canada—but the federal government has largely washed its hands of ownership regulation.
They’ve focused on increasing supply, providing tax credits to first-time buyers, and offering zero-interest loans for new construction. All noble ideas—but none address foreign capital distorting ownership models.
Even the Prohibition on the Purchase of Residential Property by Non-Canadians Act (aka the “foreign buyer ban”) was full of exemptions and easy workarounds, as covered in our article "How Foreign Buyers Use Loopholes to Purchase B.C. Homes Despite the Ban".
When it comes to tax enforcement, the CRA has no centralized system to detect satellite families:
There’s no requirement to report foreign parental support.
There’s no matching of home ownership to declared income.
There’s no audit trail for children buying homes with cash.
There’s no cross-check between student visa holders and property ownership.
So while the federal government claims to care about affordability, their tools are pointed at young Canadians—not the global elite parking wealth in their children’s names.
What Needs to Change—And How to Reclaim Communities From the Ghost Market
We’ve exposed how satellite families operate, why the system rewards their presence, and how governments have failed to address the real consequences: hollow neighborhoods, unaffordable housing, and a public sense of betrayal.
Now let’s talk solutions. Because no, this isn’t just “the way the world works.” It’s the result of deliberate policy decisions. And that means we can change it—if we have the political courage to do so. Here’s what has to happen:
1. Enforce Beneficial Ownership Transparency—With Public Access
The Land Owner Transparency Registry is a good idea in theory. In practice, it’s hidden behind paywalls, confusing, and only partially implemented.
We need a fully public, searchable database that shows:
Who truly owns each home
Who paid for it
Where the money came from
Whether the owner resides in Canada full-time
Whether they declared Canadian income
Other jurisdictions already do this. In the U.K., companies and trusts must declare beneficial owners for property held. In the U.S., the Corporate Transparency Act mandates similar disclosures. In Canada, we’ve allowed real estate to remain the last safe haven for unaccountable capital. It’s time to shut that down.
2. End Spousal and Child Workarounds
It shouldn’t be legal to route foreign capital through a child to buy a $5 million home.
We need a rule that if a child under 25—or a student—purchases a home over $1 million in cash, proof of income source must be declared to the CRA, with automatic audits triggered if income doesn’t match asset profile.
Spouses of foreign residents should also be required to declare source of funds if buying property while the primary earner lives abroad. No more hiding behind family. If the money is offshore, it should be taxed or banned.
3. Tighten Residency and Usage Requirements for Tax Benefits
If someone claims principal residency—but their lights are never on, their kids are overseas, and they report no local income—they should lose their tax exemptions.
The Speculation and Vacancy Tax needs real enforcement teeth:
Conduct random inspections
Use AI to track hydro and internet usage
Automatically penalize properties with no verifiable year-round residency
Apply a luxury home surcharge for absentee owners of $3M+ homes
4. Reform International Student and Education Visa Loopholes
Education should not be a backdoor into real estate ownership. To crack down on exploitative “student ownership,” Canada should:
Cap K-12 international student enrollment in areas with severe housing pressure
Prohibit student visa holders from owning property over a certain value
Require declarations of foreign parental support over $100,000
Automatically audit any minor with a property portfolio
Let students study. But let’s stop pretending 17-year-olds with Lamborghinis and mansions are part of an education system. They’re capital couriers.
5. Tax Foreign-Supported Households—Even If They’re Legal Residents
If a household receives the majority of its income from abroad, that money should be taxed as imputed income, even if the earner isn’t physically in Canada.
That means:
Families living here with breadwinners abroad must declare the family’s total economic picture
Tax rates should apply to household income, not just individual returns
Wealth-based audits should match declared income to housing assets
If you live in a $6 million house, you should not be filing a tax return showing $14,000 in income.
6. Launch a Provincial Ghost Home Reclamation Program
Vacant luxury homes aren’t just a lost opportunity—they’re a liability. B.C. should create a ghost property task force to identify, track, and intervene in long-term empty homes. Solutions could include:
Requiring rentals or sales after 18 months of verified vacancy
Offering below-market leases to essential workers in exchange for tax relief
Auctioning seized homes where taxes have not been paid and residency is falsified
7. Fund Local Communities, Not Just Housing Starts
Cities like Vancouver need help revitalizing neighborhoods gutted by absentee ownership.
That means:
Investing in community centers, parks, and local businesses—not just condo towers
Supporting housing co-ops and non-profit developments that guarantee long-term residency
Encouraging local ownership by offering incentives to first-time buyers who actually live and work in the neighborhood
The Bottom Line
This isn’t about blaming immigrants. It’s about building a housing system that serves people—not portfolios. Satellite families aren’t the problem. Our policies are. If we allow our cities to become shadows—beautiful on paper, empty on the ground—we lose what makes urban life meaningful. Community. Connection. Belonging.
That’s what’s at stake. It’s time to stop building homes for money, and start building them for people.
Related Articles